The Future of Crime

Lots of good insight in this TED talk. I was cringing for the first 3/4s of the video in anticipation of where he was going, but he came to the (almost) correct conclusion. (my thoughts about this are below)


Marc Goodman: A vision of crimes in the future

Marc is correct (I think) in saying we are at a point in time where we are going to have a paradigm shift in law enforcement. On a side note, there is a trend in law enforcement currently to centralize. Local agencies are working more and more with federal agencies, and global agencies are more and more involved in national issues. BUT THIS ISN’T WORKING TOO WELL. What goes though my mind every time I hear about these long, drawn out attacks by a few individuals? “Why don’t any of these citizens step up and defend themselves?” The answer is that in most parts of the world outside of Texas, people don’t think this way. Most people don’t think it is their responsibility to defend themselves or their family. (they pay taxes for someone else to do that — if you don’t believe me, read some of the comments on this youtube video) So, point #1 is that I think crimes of of the future will need to be stopped by ordinary citizens, and if not, a more oppressive, forceful, inefficient, intrusive, and less effective global police force will fill that void.

Point #2 is that I think the other part of the answer to this problem is the same answer I have to fix our government/republic system. It involves using social media to ‘vote up’ certain experts, leaders, and representatives based on actual human interactions and skill level rather than special interest and influence of money. The same system could be used to ‘grade’ how honest/trustworthy people are, and also tag people who are known to be bad people. (I know, not very PC to label someone bad) The long history of interactions with other people could have a real and meaningful implications with a tool like this. Most people would realize it is in their best interest to be good, and organized crime would be harder to implement.

Posted in Interesting | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Annoying Facebookers, Categorized

Here are some common ‘annoying facebook personalities’. I don’t fit any of these categories, still searching for my box.

Continue reading

Posted in Humor | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Who is Ludwig von Mises?

“The heroic life of Ludwig von Mises, who was and is despised by all bad guys everywhere, and cheered on by friends of freedom.” Tom Woods efforts to help people learn about the economist with the answers:

Why Ron Paul Admires Ludwig von Mises

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is the Right More Ideological Than the Left?

A new Prager University course is out. Like all of the 5-minute courses, this one is excellent. Why do we use labels?  Brainwashed?  Progressivism/Pragmatism vs Principled Thought.  By Jonah Goldberg, author of “The Tyranny of Cliches – How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas

Prager University: Jonah Goldberg on Ideology

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

P & H Posters for June 2012

Here is most of the political propaganda and humor posters I’ve posted this month:

Posted in Humor, Politics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Three Years of Lies from BO

Glenn Beck* talks about the series of lies over the past three years from BO and the repercussions of the Obamacare ruling.
“The IRS is now the most powerful arm of the federal government”
“If we are involved, if we are informed, if we have the facts, …we win”

GBR: Lies for three years
*(I’m still mad at Beck for throwing Debra Medina under the bus, and don’t trust him. Regardless of my feelings, Beck makes some excellent points here.)

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Plant a Garden, Save the World

Grow some of your own food.  Learn to garden.  These things are some of the most important things an individual can do, and some of the reasons I spend lots of my own time and treasure with the Citizen Gardener program.

How important is this?  Consider what Majory says in her recent email newsletter:

Over the years I’ve watched time and time again as the US Government passed laws that reduced personal liberty, violated the constitution, or blatantly transferred more wealth to the already wealthy.

At first I naively thought, “Wow, this is outrageous and will surely cause a riot”. But no, nothing really ever happened. Maybe some protests, demonstrations, or even a bit of debate by the talking heads on TV…

I continue to watch as more and more rights are eroded away, more and more money is printed, and the US Gov’t continues to get bigger and more powerful.

It just goes on and on. I figure Alex Jones is a prime candidate for a heart attack (and most likely it will be on the air) as he communicates atrocity after atrocity.

Surely people must be outraged?

The Tea Party and the Occupy movement have some spunk, but nothing really in comparison to the magnitude of the crimes. The powers that be seem to be able to do anything they like while people continue to roll over not care.

I often wondered – just what does it take to make people really revolt? Continue reading

Posted in Gardening | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

My Apology (and More) to Harry Pierce

I was approached in person by ex-candidate Harry Pierce, who complained to me about a few things.  His main complaint was that I called his motives into question.  His secondary complaint was that I indicated he didn’t have an understanding of the US Constitution.


My Apology (and comments) to Harry Pierce and Josh Caesar

I reviewed the post “Unqualified Congress Candidates” to see what I actually said. I agree that I unfairly called their motives (Josh Ceasar’s too) into question.  My intent was to call their qualifications into question.

For this, I apologize.

The main point I was trying to make in that post was how surprised I was that neither of the two candidates could name even one of the 18 powers given to congress by the US Constitution.

Harry brought up his military service as an example of how he fought for the Constitution. This was his example that we are both on the same side, and it is wrong for me to tear down one of my own team members. In a sense, this is correct, but I mostly disagree. I want all elected officials to really understand the meaning of the Constitution. I don’t think this is asking too much. I stand by my original statements. If you say you do in fact know the Constitution, that is fine, but you failed the test. 0 out of 18.

Harry also asked me how I would like it if someone made blog posts about me.  My answer to this is if I ask to be elected to office, calling out my abilities publicly is fair game.

Thanks for reading my blog and watching my video. I’m a gen-ex-er. I think this is how people should communicate public issues. Out in the open, honestly, for all to see.

Harry, if you read this, I encourage to leave me a message in the comments, or make your own video.  And please, if you expect to be elected to public office, learn what’s in the US Constitution!

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Sustainable Development and Agenda 21

A short video I recorded tonight on the topic of sustainable development and Agenda 21:

Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, and Agenda 21
“Individual Rights Must Take a Back Seat to the Collective” is the summation of the Agenda 21 AKA “Sustainable Development” movement.  This is tragic, because I’m a big proponent of sustainability, and would like to paint this movement in the best light possible.  Unfortunately, much of the push from the UN/ICLEI to adopt these practices are in direct conflict with basics of living in a free society. (USA for example)  To give an idea of the scope of Agenda 21, here is a quote from a 1993 UN report. The article was entitled “Agenda 21:The Earth Summit Strategy to Save our Planet.”

Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on Earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of all people…Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.

Some of the most alarming aspects of the Agenda 21 path:

  • denies personal property ownership
  • forces humans to live in packed cities, where resources can be delivered ‘more efficiently’
  • views needs of all life and animals as equal in importance to the needs of humans
  • restricts and controls all resources humans can use

For more information about the negative aspects of Agenda 21, visit the JBS website.

My thoughts on how to implement sustainability without implementing Agenda 21 style rules:

  • consider all stakeholders in design projects (includes wildlife)
  • minimize waste, minimize inputs
  • work with nature, not against it
  • observe, interact, adjust
  • use and store energy closest to source
  • operate on as local scale as possible, expand on a controlled front

All of the above suggestions come straight out of the Permaculture design system.  In short, the answer to sustainable development is to implement Permaculture everywhere.  The key contrast to this method and Agenda 21 methods is local control by stakeholders vs global control by an entity with desires to control every aspect of the planet.  Local is better!

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Rights and Commodities

Is healthcare, food, shelter, or water a right?
Bill Whittle discusses how Obamacare works, in theory.

WHY DON’T YOU MIND MY OWN BUSINESS?

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment