<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian&#039;s Blog &#187; laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.briangallimore.com/tag/laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.briangallimore.com</link>
	<description>Esse Quam Videri (To be, rather than to seem)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UNIVERSAL LAWS</title>
		<link>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/universal-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/universal-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.briangallimore.com/?p=2281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Law of Mechanical Repair &#8211; After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you&#8217;ll have to pee. 2. Law of Gravity &#8211; Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/universal-laws/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Law of Mechanical Repair &#8211; After your hands become coated with grease, your nose will begin to itch and you&#8217;ll have to pee.</p>
<p>2. Law of Gravity &#8211; Any tool, nut, bolt, screw, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.</p>
<p>3. Law of Probability -The probability of being watched is directly proportional to the stupidity of your act.</p>
<p>4. Law of Random Numbers &#8211; If you dial a wrong number, you never get a busy signal and someone always answers.</p>
<p>5. Law of the Alibi &#8211; If you tell the boss you were late for work because you had a flat tire, the very next morning you will have a flat tire.</p>
<p>6. Variation Law &#8211; If you change lines (or traffic lanes), the one you were in will always move faster than the one you are in now (works every time).</p>
<p>7. Law of the Bath &#8211; When the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.</p>
<p>8. Law of Close Encounters -The probability of meeting someone you know increases dramatically when you are with someone you don&#8217;t want to be seen with.</p>
<p>9. Law of the Result &#8211; When you try to prove to someone that a machine won&#8217;t work, it will.<br />
<span id="more-2281"></span><br />
10. Law of Biomechanics &#8211; The severity of the itch is inversely proportional to the reach.</p>
<p>11. Law of the Theater &#8211; At any event, the people whose seats are furthest from the aisle arrive last.</p>
<p>12. The Starbucks Law &#8211; As soon as you sit down to a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last until the coffee is cold.</p>
<p>13. Murphy&#8217;s Law of Lockers &#8211; If there are only two people in a locker room, they will have adjacent lockers.</p>
<p>14. Law of Physical Surfaces &#8211; The chances of an open-faced jelly sandwich landing face down on a floor covering are directly correlated to the newness and cost of the carpet/rug.</p>
<p>15. Law of Logical Argument &#8211; Anything is possible if you don&#8217;t know what you are talking about.</p>
<p>16. Brown&#8217;s Law of Physical Appearance &#8211; If the clothes fit, they&#8217;re ugly.</p>
<p>17. Oliver&#8217;s Law of Public Speaking &#8211; A closed mouth gathers no feet.</p>
<p>18.   Wilson&#8217;s Law of Commercial Marketing Strategy &#8211; As soon as you find a product that you really like, they will stop making it.</p>
<p>19.. Doctors&#8217; Law &#8211; If you don&#8217;t feel well, make an appointment to go to the doctor, by the time you get there you&#8217;ll feel better. Don&#8217;t make an appointment and you&#8217;ll stay sick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/universal-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cost of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/the-cost-of-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/the-cost-of-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.briangallimore.com/?p=2272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I listened to Dan&#8217;s podcast &#8220;Read It and Weep&#8221; on the airplane home yesterday, and it made me re-think my position on something I&#8217;ve been pretty sure about for many years. What side of the argument do you come down &#8230; <a href="http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/the-cost-of-freedom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to <a href="http://www.dancarlin.com">Dan&#8217;s </a> podcast  <a href="http://dancarlin.libsyn.com/media/dancarlin/cswdcb57.mp3">&#8220;Read It and Weep&#8221;</a> on the airplane home yesterday, and it made me re-think my position on something I&#8217;ve been pretty sure about for many years.</p>
<p>What side of the argument do you come down on in these issues:<br />
1- seat-belt laws<br />
2- Anti-Smoking laws<br />
3- motorcycle helmet laws</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve understood and agreed that if you make bad personal choices that cost me money, then you should change that behavior (though laws) because you are infringing on my right by wasting my money.  My tax dollars being spent is a form of infringement on my freedom, and your lifestyle is costing the rest of us too much money.</p>
<h3>Anti-Tax Sentiment vs Behavioral Freedoms</h3>
<p>The standard Libertarian definition on the correct limit of freedom is: &#8220;the right to swing my fist ends where the other man&#8217;s nose begins&#8221;  (or be as free as you like until you cause harm to someone else).  Now the problem is how harm is defined.  We tend to group everything in one bucket but getting punched in the nose and paying taxes are not equal in terms of how much your rights were infringed on.  (Direct harm vs Wallet rights)  There are both Direct Freedoms (I have the right to do x) and Indirect Freedoms (If you do x, then I have to pay y for it).</p>
<p>The problem with the philosophy of restricting behavior freedoms based on wallet rights is that the only freedoms you are allowed to have are the ones that don&#8217;t cost anyone else any money.  We have to realize that we all cost each other money.  Everyone lives at the expense of everyone else.  When we think about the &#8216;cost of freedom&#8217;, we usually think about lost lives of the American military, fighting for our freedom, but realize there are many other costs, including actual dollars and cents. <strong> The ideal that an American&#8217;s right to not pay for things is as important as other American&#8217;s right to do things is Un-American at it&#8217;s core!</strong> The part we forgot <span id="more-2272"></span>is the concept that &#8220;You support my freedoms and I&#8217;ll support yours and they all cost money and that&#8217;s just part of the deal&#8221;.  Pitting us against one another based on the cost of behavior choices is one more way the US citizens are being divided.</p>
<h3>How does this tie in to ObamaCare?</h3>
<p>National health care will be the avenue to allow control over ALL of your behavioral freedoms and lifestyle choices.  Private health care is already trying to doing this.  The difference will be the government will have the power to <strong>make laws</strong> about your freedoms and choices.</p>
<p>If the Obama administration and Democrats was honest about what the healthcare bill would mean, they would ask &#8220;we are all going to have to give up freedom to in some of our lifestyle choices&#8230; the government is going to have to be more involved, your neighbors will have to be more involved,</p>
<p>Do your neighbors have a right to dictate what you eat?  Just wait and see!</p>
<p>Government has no role telling people what they can eat, how much they must exercise or what activities they can participate in&#8230; people have died to protect these freedoms.  Health care is between the individual and their doctor!</p>
<p>Another thought (from Ken E):<br />
Do you honestly believe we can simultaneously : (1) MAINTAIN the insurance coverage of the presently insured (2) cover 40 million ADDITIONAL people and (3) spend LESS money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/08/the-cost-of-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://dancarlin.libsyn.com/media/dancarlin/cswdcb57.mp3" length="39712624" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE 545 PEOPLE</title>
		<link>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/06/the-545-people/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/06/the-545-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[545 people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.briangallimore.com/?p=1824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE 545 PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF AMERICA&#8217;S WOES BY CHARLEY REESE (copied from here) Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats &#8230; <a href="http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/06/the-545-people/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE 545 PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF AMERICA&#8217;S WOES<br />
BY CHARLEY REESE (copied from <a href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/woes.htm">here</a>)<br />
<a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/sorrnCMxErwZDLkcgQDlWg?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_5WtbU3zolGY/SihzUcWgRqI/AAAAAAAAJBM/8U38AC_MMSI/s800/545.jpg" /></a><br />
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.</p>
<p>Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?<br />
<span id="more-1824"></span><br />
You and I don&#8217;t propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don&#8217;t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don&#8217;t write the tax code. Congress does. You and I don&#8217;t set fiscal policy. Congress does. You and I don&#8217;t control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.</p>
<p>One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president and nine Supreme Court justices &#8211; 545 human beings out of the 235 million &#8211; are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.</p>
<p>I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.</p>
<p>I excluded all but the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don&#8217;t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.</p>
<p>No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislation&#8217;s responsibility to determine how he votes.</p>
<p>A CONFIDENCE CONSPIRACY</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you see how the con game that is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.</p>
<p>What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of Tip O&#8217;Neill, who stood up and criticized Ronald Reagan for creating deficits.</p>
<p>The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes.</p>
<p>O&#8217;neill is the speaker of the House. He is the leader of the majority party. He and his fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetos it, they can pass it over his veto.</p>
<p>REPLACE SCOUNDRELS</p>
<p>It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 235 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted &#8212; by present facts &#8211; of incompetence and irresponsibility.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.</p>
<p>When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.</p>
<p>If the tax code is unfair, it&#8217;s because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it&#8217;s because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in Lebanon, it&#8217;s because they want them in Lebanon.</p>
<p>There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.</p>
<p>Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical forces like &#8220;the economy,&#8221; &#8220;inflation&#8221; or &#8220;politics&#8221; that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.</p>
<p>Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. They and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses &#8211; provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.</p>
<p>This article was taken from the Orlando Sentinel Star newspaper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/06/the-545-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Surround Them</title>
		<link>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/02/we-surround-them-wesurroundthemgmailcom/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/02/we-surround-them-wesurroundthemgmailcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 04:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Spirco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wesurroundthem@gmail.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.briangallimore.com/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve heard about the $500,000 salary cap law for the TARP executives, right? Damn those evil big-shot executives! Well guess what, that law is another hose job. It is total BS. The law has no method of enforcement or penalty; &#8230; <a href="http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/02/we-surround-them-wesurroundthemgmailcom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve heard about the $500,000 salary cap law for the TARP executives, right?  Damn those evil big-shot executives!  Well guess what, that law is another hose job.  It is total BS.  The law has no method of enforcement or penalty; it is worthless EXCEPT as a smokescreen for what else is going on, which is the $ trillion &#8220;stimulus&#8221; bill.  Now we are hearing the Republicans and Democrats are working to &#8220;cut out the pork&#8221;, which is more BS.  What they are doing is rearranging it to appease public opinion, but actually they are not arguing about whether to spend the money or not, they are arguing HOW to spend the money.   It will get passed, and all the lawmakers will all get some of their pet projects added in, and government will in fact grow.  They are inciting fear and panic to get the social programs in place that they haven&#8217;t been able to do before.  They don&#8217;t want to &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html">let a serious crisis go to waste</a>.&#8221; (said by White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel)</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t be fooled!</strong>  What can you do?  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/the-trillion-dollar-stimulus-and-storing-food">Jack Spirco</a> brought this up today.  Take a look at this simple plan below to send a powerful message to our government:<br />
<span id="more-1285"></span><br />
<embed type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src='http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf' id='mediumFlashEmbedded' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer' bgcolor='#000000' allowScriptAccess='always' allowFullScreen='true' quality='high' name='FOX News' play='false' scale='noscale' menu='false' salign='LT' scriptAccess='always' wmode='false' height='275' width='305' flashvars='playerId=videolandingpage&#038;playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&#038;categoryTitle=undefined&#038;referralObject=3528822' /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/21018/">GLENN</a>: So I&#8217;m going to just ask you right now just to think of these things and just answer out loud. Just say to yourself yes or no. Yes or no. Is this who I am? Is this what I believe? Because I believe you and I agree on most of these.</p>
<p>1) Yes or no: Do you believe America is a good place, that we&#8217;ve lost our way over the years, that we have done bad things but generally speaking we tried hard. We try to make amends. We have tried to do the right thing. Just like everybody else, we fail from time to time and we have truly lost our way in the last 20 years. But gosh, if you look at America, she&#8217;s good and our founders were good and our founding documents are good. We&#8217;ve just strayed too far away from them. Yes or no.</p>
<p>2) Yes or no: I believe in God. I may not go to the same church or synagogue or mosque as the majority of people in America, but I believe in God and he is the center of my life, and God does not tell people to behead others or to persecute others that see God in a different way. As long as that god is not telling them to persecute others.</p>
<p>3) Yes or no: It is my responsibility to try to be better and a more honest person than I was yesterday. Sometimes I fail, I&#8217;ll make mistakes, but it&#8217;s my main mission to be better than I was personally than I was yesterday.</p>
<p>4) Yes or no: The family is sacred. I and my spouse are the ultimate authority under God when it comes to my family. I raise my family, and that comes with a grave responsibility. If I fail, I answer to God.</p>
<p>5) Yes or no: If you break the law, you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.</p>
<p>6) Yes or no: I have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but that is not a guarantee of equal results.</p>
<p>7) Yes or no: I work hard for what I have, and I will share it with others that I choose when I choose, should I choose. Government cannot force me to be charitable.</p>
<p>8) It is not un-American for anyone to disagree with my opinion, but my opinion or others&#8217; opinions may be anti-American. Anti-American rhetoric would be anything that is destructive to the Constitution and our country as our founders understood it.</p>
<p>9) And the last one is the government works for me. The government answers to me. I do not answer to the government.</p>
<p>How many are there? One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. There are nine of them. Do you agree with seven of them?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I want you to do. Step one: No matter where you are right now, I want you to take a picture of yourself. I want you to take a picture, and I ask you and you&#8217;ll understand as we go in the next couple of weeks, I ask you if you could bring these and ask your children &#8212; can we post these please on the Internet, on the website? I want you to ask as many people as you know, do you believe in these things? Just seven out of nine. Do you believe in them? Then will you please take a picture of yourself. If you ask your family and you ask your children tonight, do you believe in these things. Take a picture of your spouse. Not as a family. Take them one at a time and send them to me, e-mail them to me at &#8212; what is the address, Stu? Wesurroundthem@gmail.com. This is how much I believe that you are not alone.</p>
<p>Last night I stayed in the city and I was here late last night because we had a few things that we were working on for this project and the first thing that we did was who has the server space to take all of these pictures. GlennBeck.com which has the server space all over, we have the website under our umbrella of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, me, Ryan Seacrest. They&#8217;re big servers. We didn&#8217;t feel we could handle the amount that is going to be coming in. Fox News didn&#8217;t feel they had big enough servers that would hold all of this volume without crashing. That&#8217;s why we went to gmail, because they have unlimited amount to be able to take all of this in in big doses. Now, maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I ask you to prove a point.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m going to ask you every day for the next two or three weeks. Please, if you agree with these things, please send me a photo. I will explain on, is it &#8212; do we know, is it going to be February 27th? We don&#8217;t know? We don&#8217;t have a date yet. And I&#8217;ll explain on February 27th &#8212; I think it&#8217;s going to be that date, in the next couple of weeks &#8212; and I&#8217;m going to do a special radio show and television show. It&#8217;s going to be a live show. We are going to also have you have an opportunity to attend. I will tell you about that in the coming days. I will also tell you in the coming days that you don&#8217;t have to come to New York to be a part of it, either. But this is all going to be grassroots. I&#8217;m going to be asking you if you want to put together a, if you have a bar or, you know, you own a hotel and you want to do a conference center kind of thing where, you know, you can just open up the doors and anybody who wants to come and watch the TV show or you want to do it at the bar, you want to do it at your house. Don&#8217;t watch this TV show and don&#8217;t &#8212; I believe it&#8217;s going to be February 27th. Could be a week later. Don&#8217;t be alone, and you&#8217;ll understand why on that day. But I ask you today, do this one thing. Do you believe in these things?</p>
<p>Everybody else is going to talk about the damn stimulus package today. Do you believe in these things? If you do, then do me a favor, please, do your children a favor. Take a picture of yourself and send it to me at wesurroundthem@gmail.com. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.briangallimore.com/2009/02/we-surround-them-wesurroundthemgmailcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

